![]() ![]() Those who are convicted of this crime will be sentenced to imprisonment of between one and three years. A person who spreads disinformation is defined as “a person who publicly disseminates false information about the internal or external security, public order or general health of the country in a way that can disturb the public peace, with the sole aim of creating anxiety, fear or panic among the society. With new articles added to the Turkish Penal Code (TCK), the crime of “publicly disseminating misleading information” is explained for the first time. The law was aimed at combatting disinformation, and extensive censorship was also introduced regarding the operations of the Turkish intelligence agency MİT. ![]() Nordic Monitor previously reported that the government of President Recep Tayyip Erdogan planned to increase its control over news websites and social media with new legislation that entered into force on October 14, 2022. Twitter also claimed that no further legal action was possible before the start of voting.Īll the accounts that were ordered to be blocked by decisions made by government-controlled courts belong to critics and journalists in exile who had to flee Turkey. The documents released on Monday were nothing more than court decisions that social media users in Turkey are very familiar with, s o it is still unknown which government official or authority threatened to shut Twitter down completely. “We received what we believed to be a final threat to throttle the service – after several such warnings – and so in order to keep Twitter available over the election weekend, took action on four accounts and 409 Tweets identified by court order,” Twitter said in a statement posted by its Global Government Affairs team. On Monday Twitter published e-mail correspondence with the Information and Communication Technologies Authority (BTK) and past court decisions, including a request to block access to Nordic Monitor. Which one do you want?” After a flood of negative reactions from users, he had to announce that they would publish the documents sent to them by the Turkish government. ![]() Twitter owner Elon Musk reacted to Bloomberg columnist Matthew Yglesias’s message describing the blocking decision on the eve of the elections as censorship, tweeting, “Did your brain fall out of your head, Yglesias? The choice is to have Twitter throttled in its entirety or limit access to some tweets. Last December, the two were seen in an awkward minute-long handshake at the World Cup.One day before the May 14 presidential and parliamentary elections in Turkey, Twitter announced that access to accounts belonging to vocal critics of the government had been blocked in Turkey and that this was done to prevent Twitter from being completely shut down in the country. Erdoğan and Musk have been growing close since at least 2017, with business deals between Turkey and the many companies owned by Musk such as Tesla and SpaceX. A recent example was the infamous banning of the account ElonJet from Twitter on some spurious security claim and the subsequent temporary suspension of journalists who criticized him. Musk has called himself a "free speech absolutist" in the past, a fanciful claim that has been refuted on many occasions by the erratic CEO’s actions. This is what it means to treat freedom of expression as a principle rather than a slogan,” Wales said. “What Wikipedia did: we stood strong for our principles and fought to the Supreme Court of Turkey and won. The contention was around articles that accused the country of having links to terrorist organizations. They challenged the ban in court and, in 2019, won. ![]() Quote tweeting the exchange between Musk and Yglesias, Wales succinctly pointed out what the Wikipedia foundation did when Turkey banned it for two years. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |